<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Negotiation Law Blog - Joint Sessions and Unicorn Settlements - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/</link>
      <description>Southern California Arbitration Mediation &amp; Conflict Resolution: Settle it Now Dispute Resolution Services: Serving Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Century City</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:03:39 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Gavin Craig</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Max on the environment of business litigation.  Parties that have expectations of future business don't often sue each other, although when they do there is another lever to pull to try to resolve the case.  </p>

<p>I really like the idea of an early mediation, but only if I think we can get somewhere.  Max's story about no responses to offer letters is common, and (if I can be a little cynical) in some cases can be explained as the lawyers wanting to bill more on a case before they get serious about a settlement.  I am not suggesting that this is a universal motive, and I have had clients that refused to negotiate, and instead wanted me to bring additional claims.  </p>

<p>Another tactic is to schedule a pretrial conference with the judge early in the case.  Some judges have a strong impression on clients and can push them toward settlement.   </p>

<p>Business litigation is usually (but not always) about money.  The plaintiff wants more and the defendant(s) don't want to pay anything, or much less than the plaintiff claims, or think they should be paid.  I often tell clients and colleagues that parties are almost always better off making their own decisions, rather than rely on others to make the decision for them.  </p>

<p>I too am looking forward to your thoughts and comments.         </p>

<p>Gavin Craig</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/conflict-resolution/joint-sessions-and-unicorn-settlements/#22349</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/conflict-resolution/joint-sessions-and-unicorn-settlements/#22349</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/mediation">Advocacy</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/mediation">Collaboration</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Conflict Resolution</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/negotiation">Deal Making</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/social-psychology">Evolutionary Biology</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/settlement">Federal Court</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Legal Practice</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Mediation</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/negotiation">Money</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Negotiation</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/negotiation">Negotiation Strategy and Tactics</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Power of Persuasion</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Settlement</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Social Psychology</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/settlement">State Court</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">The Courts</category><category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Truth Justice and the American Way</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:36:11 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Victoria Pynchon</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
