<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Negotiation Law Blog - Negotiating Law Firm Layoffs:  the Narrative of Mediation - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/</link>
      <description>Southern California Arbitration Mediation &amp; Conflict Resolution: Settle it Now Dispute Resolution Services: Serving Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Century City</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:02:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:02:03 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Joe</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, what happens when neither side of an issue is "right" or "wrong"?  There's a lot of gray area that the law is asked to define, when I think that is a nearly impossible task.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/legal-practice/negotiating-law-firm-layoffs-the-narrative-of-mediation/#22468</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/legal-practice/negotiating-law-firm-layoffs-the-narrative-of-mediation/#22468</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Legal Practice</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Victoria Pynchon</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Vickie</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens at the end of the Litigation Story when there's neither a "right" or "wrong" is that someone is further injured and suffers a greater sense of injustice.  What we believe can and often does happen at the end of the Mediation Story when there's neither a "right" or a "wrong" is as follows:</p>

<p>1.  the parties give up their view of a black/white, right/wrong, morally unambiguous narrative of their loss;<br />
2.  the parties often experience their loss for the first time because they must give up their belief that they will be completely vindicated at trial and fully compensated for what would otherwise be a loss;<br />
3.  one or both parties must accept their own and their opponents' human frailties as well as the role that circumstances beyond anyone's control played in their loss;<br />
4.  both parties must assume responsibility for their part in the loss-causing event (if any);<br />
5.  both parties must work together in good faith to arrive at a solution to what has become their mutual problem - the litigation and their inability to resolve their dispute without seeking the judgment of a third party who is a stranger to it;<br />
6.  one or both parties MAY experience forgiveness (giving and/or receiving); understanding; and, reconciliation with their opponent or simply with the way things are, i.e., often beyond our control but not beyond our ability to bear or our power to repair.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/legal-practice/negotiating-law-firm-layoffs-the-narrative-of-mediation/#22469</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/legal-practice/negotiating-law-firm-layoffs-the-narrative-of-mediation/#22469</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.negotiationlawblog.com/">Legal Practice</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Victoria Pynchon</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
